Applying UDL Principles to Writing Assignment Instructions
Have you ever noticed
how some products just make sense: a wider handle on a potato peeler
for easier gripping or software that automatically corrects commonly
misspelled word. In both instances these products were originally
conceived to meet the needs of people with disabilities but ended
up benefiting all users. Universal Design for Learning (UDL) takes
the concept of universal design and applies it to learning.
Below are suggestions on how to apply UDL principles to the design and delivery
of writing assignment instructions.
#1 – Design instructions
with the user in mind
What makes some products intuitive to use and others almost impossible
to figure out even with an instruction manual? In a word, usability.
This refers to how well a user can perform the designated task
with the tool provided. If the tool works well, the user should
be able to perform the task effortlessly and effectively. This
can be achieved in assignment instructions by recognizing, designing,
and delivering the instructions with the different needs of different
learners in mind. Scholars in rhetoric and composition acknowledge
the importance and impact of the assignments and their instructions
(Bernhardt, 1986; Clark, 2005; Costanzo, 1986; Johannessen, 1989; Kirsch, 1988;
Nelson, 1995; Walvoord & McCarthy,
1990). But a UDL perspective
brings all of these ideas together while never losing sight of
that the goal is making the assignment accessible to all students.
For example, students with learning disabilities will need content
in small chunks. Students with limited sight will need instructions
sheets in large font. Here are suggestions on how to design your
instruction sheets with usability in mind.
- Present information in small chunks separated by
headers
- Put key tasks and dates in bold
- Be generous with white space
- Refrain from trying to make text fit on one sheet
by reverting to very small font
- Provide supplement information explaining key aspects
of the assignment
#2- Reduce barriers to accessing the assignment
In college classes, assignments are tools for learning. And yet,
getting students to give the assignment instructions a close and
thoughtful reading is often difficult
(Nelson, 1995)
. For some, the assignment
presentation is inaccessible because of its delivery format. For
other students, not having the assignment available when needed
becomes a barrier. Making assignment instructions readily accessible
in multiple modes and formats encourages use. Here are some strategies
for reducing barriers to accessing assignment instruction sheets:
- Prepare the assignments in advance for students who
need the assignment delivered in an alternate delivery mode,
such as transferred to Braille or read orally through a text
to speech reader.
- Go over the instructions orally in class
- Make the instructions and supplemental material accessible
in multiple formats. In addition to distributing a print version
in class, make the instructions accessible online through a
course management system like Blackboard as a downloable
Word file or .pdf file. By placing the assignment on a web site
or a course management system, the assignment is available 24/7
#3 – Establish and articulate an assignment's
goals and objectives and criteria for assessment from the start
One of the keys to building in flexibility in an assignment is
the clear articulation of an assignment's goals and objectives.
A goal is the broad general statement about what
the students will learn from doing the assignment. The objectives
are the specific learning outcomes; in other words, what the student
will be able to do after completing the assignment. In the teaching
of writing, clearly articulated goals and objectives aids in a
student's ability to understand an assignment and a teacher's ability
to teach writing
(Fulkerson, 1990; Shipka, 2005). By focusing
on the goals and objectives in the assignment design process, one
can identify places where flexibility in presentation or engagement
can occur without reducing the academic rigor of the assignment.
For example, if the goal of an oral presentation is to demonstrate
the ability to synthesize and summarize information, then how that
presentation is delivered can be flexible. For a student who is
deaf, presenting information orally is a barrier. However, the
same objectives for the assignment can be met through a PowerPoint
presentation. This is an example of how clearly articulated goals
and objectives aid flexibility.
Equally important, if an assignment's goals and objectives are
articulated, the criteria for evaluation is also clear allowing
for flexibility in execution. For example, if a student is ADHD,
that student may have learned accommodation strategies to help
gather and organize ideas on paper. These strategies may be different
from those presented in a course, but more usabe for the student.
If the student understands the criteria for assessment, the student
can use the accommodation strategies he or she knows to do the
assignment and then reformat the assignment in its final draft
to meet the assessment criteria. Here are some strategies for presenting
an assignment's goals, objectives, and assessment criteria:
- List the assignment goals and objectives on the assignment
sheet
- Explain how these assignment goals and objectives
fit into overall course goals
- List the criteria for evaluation on the assignment
sheet
- Explain the assessment process for the assignment
when the instructions are distributed
#4 - Provide visuals and examples
Research in the technical writing aspect of instruction design
has found that a user is more likely to successfully complete directions
if representations of the finish product are provided, particularly
visual
(Ganier, 2004). For a class assignment, this means providing students
access to examples of parts or the entire completed assignment.
Giving student access to student examples of the kind of writing
that is expected for an assignment is extremely helpful to all
students. This is not a case of you doing the work for the student.
It is modeling the proper or correct writing format, organization,
content, and style. One of the fundaments of UDL in assignment
design is to avoid the temptation to assume the students are proficient
in every aspect of the task or genre you assign. Just as a person
would have a hard time putting together the parts of a barbeque
without instructions even if the person had a general idea of what
a barbeque looked like, so too our students greatly benefit from
having writing samples of a particular assignment.
- This can be done on the paper version of the assignment instruction
sheet by including short examples. You can also provide handouts
of longer examples
- Provide the URL on the instruction sheet where the student
can go for additional examples
- Post examples on the course Blackboard site in a designated
example section
- To get your own examples, ask students of previous classes
if you can share their writing with your current students. You
will want to get permission from your students. Examples in a
classroom textbook are nice, but they pale in comparison from
real examples from former students
- Choose several examples that show different approaches to the
assignment to avoid the student temptation to think there is
only one way to do something
Benefits of Applying UDL to Instructions
Applying UDL principles
to assignment instruction design will benefit both you and your
students. A UDL enhanced instruction sheet will increase your
students' opportunity for success by making the assignment accessible
to all learners through added clarity, flexibility, and focus.
When the instructions are clear, well thought out, and self-explanatory,
students have the tools they need to succeed in meeting the assignment's
objectives. Moreover, building more robust instructions can make
the assignment a learning tool itself. This happens because you
can build in examples and explanations right into the instructions
itself reinforcing the learning objectives of the assignment. This approach equally benefits you, the instructor, by reducing
the number of students who struggle or fail with an assignment.
UDL enhanced assignment instructions can help your students produce
the papers you want to read. Indeed, being clear in the goal and
objectives of an assignment and presenting the task so that all
students understand and can succeed is nothing new. It is just
good teaching.
Resources
- Bernhardt, S. A. (1986). Seeing the Text. College Composition and
Communication, 37 (1), 66-78.
- Clark, I. (2005). A Genre Approach to Writing Assignments. Composition
Forum, 2 (14).
- Costanzo, W. (1986). Film as Composition. College Composition and
Communication, 37 (1), 79-86.
- Fulkerson, R. (1990). Composition Theory in the Eighties: Axiological
Consensus and Paradigmatic Diversity. College Composition and Communication,
41 (4), 409-429.
- Ganier, F. (2004). Factors Affecting the Processing of Procedural Instructions:
Implications for Document Design. IEEE Transactions on Professional
Communication, 47 (1), 15-26.
- George, D. (2002). From Analysis to Design: Visual Communication in
the Teaching of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 4 (54),
11-39.
- Johannessen, L. R. (1989). Teaching Writing: Motivating Inquiry. The
English Journal, 78 (2), 64-66.
- Kirsch, G. (1988). Students' Interpretations of Writing Tasks: A Case
Study. Journal of Basic Writing, 7 (2), 81-90.
- Nelson, J. (1995). Reading Classrooms as Text: Exploring Student Writers'
Interpretive Practices. College Composition and Communication, 46 (3),
441-429.
- Shipka, J. (2005). A Multimodal Task-Based Framework for Composing. College
Composition and Communication, 57 (2), 277-306.
- Straub, R., & Lunsford, R. F. (1995). Twelve Readers Reading:
Responding to College Student Writing . Cresskill, NJ: Hampton
Press.
- Walvoord, B. E., & McCarthy, L. P. (1990). Thinking and Writing
in College: A Naturalistic Study of Students in Four Disciplines .
Urbana, IL: NCTE.
|